| Islam  - Elevation of Women's Status 
 by Sheikh  Ali Al-Timimi Assalaamu `Alaykum Wa  Rahmatullaahi Wa Barakaatuhu Al hamdu lillaah was salaatu was  salaamu `alaa rasoolillaah, `amma ba`d: The topic that I was asked to  discuss here at McGill University is the elevation of the status  of women in Islam. Many, upon hearing the title of this lecture,  might assume it to be an oxymoron because the prevalent idea - at  least in the West - is that Islam. does not elevate the status of  women, but that Islam. oppresses and suppresses women. So people  might find the title in itself to be shocking or a curiosity at  least. In discussing this topic - since  it appears to me that this is a mixed audience of Muslims and  non-Muslims - I'd like to make my remarks and comments brief. I  will take no more than thirty to forty five minutes, and then  allow you an opportunity to ask your questions. Perhaps the  question and answer session might be more fruitful in addressing  specific accusations, understandings or misunderstandings  regarding the status of women in Islam. As we all know, in the world  today, there are - for the overwhelming majority of humanity -  basically two world views. These two views are often in conflict  - not only on the personal level where individual human beings  are making choices, but also on the international level in terms  of the debate over the authenticity and correctness of these two  world views. The first world view, which I am  sure most of us are aware of, is the Western liberal view. A view  which claims to draw its roots from the Judeo-Christian tradition  that probably, upon investigation, is more well rooted in the  ideas that appeared after the reformation; ideas that are rooted  in secularism and the world view that appeared thereafter during  the 'era of enlightenment'. The second view is that of the  Muslims - the Islamic world view, and this view says that its  roots and ideas lie in the revelation given by God (or Allah in  Arabic) to the prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam).  Those who proclaim this view say that it can be used by humanity  during all ages and times, and that its relevance and benefit is  not restricted to a certain period of time, geographic area or  certain race of human beings. Likewise, the adherents of the  first view, that of Western secularism and the liberal  tradition, believe that their world view, ideas, culture and  civilization are the best for humanity. Some of you might have  read a book that came out a few years ago by an American author  of Japanese decent (Francis Fukuyama) called "The End of  Time". He basically put forth the theory that human  development in terms of its ideas has concluded with this final  period of liberal secular thought and nothing more will come to  humanity. However in his book he adds that that the only part of  the world which has not adopted this secular human view is the  Islamic world and proposes that there will be a conflict in terms  of this ideology in the Islamic world. With that brief introduction, one  of the topics of contention between these two worlds views, that  of the secular liberal humanist in the West and the Islamic  tradition, concerns women. What is the position and status of  women? How are women looked to? Are women elevated in one culture  and oppressed in another? The Western view is that women are  elevated only in the West and that they are getting more and more  rights with the passage of time, while their sisters - they say -  in the Islamic world are still being suppressed. The Muslims who  they encounter say that in actuality it is the Islamic system  that provides the true freedoms for men and women alike, and  women in the West as well as men, are deceived into an idea of  freedom which really doesn't exist. What I'd like to discuss this  evening is exactly how Islam. looks to women. And therefore my  discussion will be more upon - what we might say for the lack of  a better term - the philosophical basis, rather than the  individual practices which vary from one country to the other.  How women are understood in Islam. cannot be properly understood  - and this is more significant, I feel - unless one understands  exactly what we might call the philosophical basis or ideological  understanding - since this is really a theological concept. First, let's review how exactly  women were thought of and understood in the western tradition, to  compare and contrast perspectives. We know that the western  tradition sees itself as the intellectual inheritors of the Greek  tradition that existed before the prophet Jesus Christ (peace be  upon him), and so therefore many of the intellectual traditions  of the West are found to some degree in the writings of the early  Greek philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and so forth. How did they look towards women?  What were the ideas of Aristotle and Plato towards women? When  one reviews the works of these early Greek philosophers, he finds  that they had very disparaging views of women. Aristotle in his  writings argued that women were not full human beings and that  the nature of woman was not that of a full human person. As a  result, women were by nature deficient, not to be trusted and to  be looked down upon. In fact, writings describe that the free  women in many aspects of the Greek society - except for the very  few women of the elite classes - had positions no better than  animals and slaves. This Aristotelian view of women  was later carried on into the early Christian tradition of the  Catholic church. Saint Thomas of Aquinas in his writings proposed  that women were the trap of Satan. The issue of Adam and Eve  added a dimension to the earlier Greek ideas of Aristotle; women  were the cause of the downfall of man and therefore were Satan's  trap and should be looked at with caution and weariness because  they caused the first downfall of humanity and all thus evil  precedes from women. This type of thought was persistent within  the writings of the Church fathers throughout the Middle Ages. In  their writings we find this theme proposed in one aspect or  another. However, after the Protestant reformation Europe decided  to free itself from the shackles and chains of the Catholic  church. Ideas which have been entitled as the Age of  Enlightenment or thought of as such, caused them to feel that  they needed to free themselves from many of these ideas. Some of  these ideas were scientific in nature, that the earth goes around  the sun, instead of the sun going around the earth; theological  in nature, as in the writings of Martin Luther; and also social  in nature, like the position of women in society. However, the  writers of the Enlightenment still carried this basic theme that  was not much of a switch - women where not full human beings.  French writers during the revolution, like Rousseau, Voltaire and  others, looked at women as a burden that needed to be taken care  of. This is why I believe it's Rousseau in his book  "Emile", which he wrote concerning the education of  women, proposed a different form of education for women based  upon the fact that women were unable to understand what men were  able to understand.  This is the tradition that the  West inherited and thereafter we find in the 1800's the first  writings appearing by women and some men calling for the change  of these ideas. And with this we have the origins of the first  feminine movements. One of the first books written was the  "Vindication for the Rights of Women" by Mary  Walsencraft which appeared in the 1800's. Thereafter the  tradition of women receiving certain rights came. The first of  these were basically legal rights because until the 1800's women  were not able to own property and were not able to dispose of  their wealth as men did. It is very well known that the first  laws that allowed women to own property in the United States or  in Europe appeared only in the last couple of decades of the  1800's. The Industrial Revolution caused  another impetus, another search, to this feminist movement. Women  in the Industrial Revolution, especially England, were forced to  labor for many hours in the coal mines and so forth, and would  receive no pay whatsoever compared to men. So therefore the first  calling of the movement was that people who work the same amount  of hours deserved the same amount of money or pay. Finally a break occurred in this  century of basically all which is understood from the Western  tradition. Coming from the latter feminist movement which  appeared after World War II, a new movement called for the  emancipation of women not only in terms of legal rights, but it  also questioned some of the morals of society and called for  greater sexual freedoms for women and men alike. It contended  that basically a lot of problems were caused by the institution  of marriage and the ideas of family and so forth. People wrote  concerning the need to break from these. And finally in the 1990's, the  prevalent argument in the West is that we should discuss genders,  not sexes. This idea was expressed recently in a book which came  out a year ago called "The Age of Extremes". The author  discusses the idea that there is no difference between male or  female and that gender is so only due to environment. So  therefore we can change the environment so that men could take  the roles of women and women take the roles of men by changing  the education and climate. This is where it has ended up now. So  we find in this 2500 year old western tradition, we come from the  first extreme which was expressed by the Greeks, where women were  denied their essential humanity, to this extreme expressed today  where there is no differences between the sexes and it is an  issue of gender, climate and environment. This is, of course, a  very brief summary of the first world view. I didn't do justice  to those 2500 years in just those few minutes, but it just gives  us an idea. The other view which I would like  to talk about in more detail is the Islamic view. How does Islam.  look at the issue of women? Well, first of all, we should  understand that Muslims unlike, for instance, the Greek  philosophers or the French writers after the French revolution,  do not feel that their concepts, ideas and beliefs are those of  fellow men. But rather they believe that what they are taught,  what they believe, what they practice, and all that is tied to  this, is part of a divine revelation given to them by God. And  so, its truth and veracity is not questionable because of it  being revelation from God. The argument is that God knows best  that which He created. He created human beings, He is a God of  wisdom, and a God of all knowledge and so therefore He knows what  is best. And He decrees that which is best for humanity, His  creatures. Therefore, Muslims try to live by a code of law which  is an expression of that belief. Now I don't want to discuss the  various details of the code of law because that, I feel, would  not really benefit us in this lecture. Although perhaps some of  that might come out in the question and answer session and I'll  be glad to entertain any questions you might have. But what I  would like to discuss is how does Islam. look at women, i.e. what  is womanhood in Islam.? Did Muslims believe like the early Greek  writers or early church fathers that women were not full human  begins? Did they feel that women where Satan's trap, so therefore  should be shunned and looked at as something evil and dangerous?  How did they perceive women? Upon investigating into the  traditions of Islam. which is, as I said, based on revelation  known as the Qur'an, we find that it becomes very clear that  Muslims are taught that men and women share a single humanity -  that they are equal in their humanity and that there is no  difference in the amount of human nature in them. We might now  take that for granted, but as I explained, the initial western  civilization was based on the fact that women were not full human  beings. So this being something that was  taught 1400 years ago was a revolutionary idea in the sense that  it is only within the last 100 years or so that the issue of  women being full human beings has come to be accepted in western  intellectual circles. Initially, women were not considered full  human beings. The Qur'an in describing the  origins of human beings tells them, the translation of which  would be something like "O humanity! Verily we have created  you from a single male and a single female, and have made you  into tribes and peoples so that you may know one another. Verily  the most honorable of you are those who are most pious with  God." [49:13] This verse in the Qur'an teaches that humans  come from a single male and a single female. The indication here  is that the male and female in terms of their human nature are at  an equal level. Likewise another verse, from a chapter which is  known in the Qur'an as the chapter of Women - because most of  the issues discussed there are laws dealing with women - starts  off with a verse which could be translated as "O humanity!  Verily We have created you from a single soul, and have made from  it its mate," this is a reference to Adam and Eve, "and  have made from both of them many people, men and women, and  scattered them throughout the earth." [4:1] So here again is  the issue of men and women and all human beings coming from a  single source, a single family, a single set of parents. This  shows that women share in full humanity with men. Likewise in the traditions of the  Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) - which is the  second source of the Islamic religion - we find that the Prophet  Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) said in a Hadith that  indeed verily women are the twin halves of men. The Arabic word  shaqaa'iq, which I translated as twin halves, means taking  something and splitting it in half. The understanding is that  there is a single humanity, a single essence which is shared, and  there are twin halves of that - one is man and one is women. This  is repeated often in the Qur'an The words of the Prophet  Mohammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) also emphasize this. As  I said, this is a very important concept to understand when one  reflects on how traditional western civilization looked at women  as not being full partners and not sharing in humanity. Although  now, we might not find much surprise to that because it is a  given perhaps that men and women are full human beings. But this  is something that is a late occurrence in western traditions. Let us take it to another step,  what is the aim of humanity? What is the purpose for which human  beings exist on earth, to what ends do they strive? What will  occur to them if they strive to those ends and what will occur to  them if they did not strive to those ends? Since Islam. is a  religion which sees itself as revelation from God and the truth,  Muslims would feel that human beings have a set purpose here on  earth; that in everything of God's creation there is wisdom.  There is nothing of God's creation that does not have any wisdom.  There is nothing for sport or play and so therefore human beings  have a purpose, and that purpose has been elucidated for them in  the teaching of Islam. They were created to worship God. A verse  from the Qur'an says that God says that He has not created human  beings except to worship Him. So therefore, the essence of  humanity is the same between male and female, and they also share  the same aim and that is to worship God. And that is the most  important issue in the Islamic culture and civilization. You know  that the Islamic culture and civilization is rooted in religious  belief. American civilization is rooted in what? In the writings  of the founding fathers of the United States of America. It is  rooted in the Declaration of Independence, the ideals which were  placed therein. It is rooted in the Constitution of the United  States. It is rooted in some of the arguments between monarchy or  democracy which were written by some of the early writers or  founding fathers. So it is rooted in a political thought. Yes, it  might have some traditions which go back further and extend to  certain ideas like in parts of Christianity and so forth, but in  its essence it is a political thought, unlike Islam. which is a  religion in its essence. The civilization of Islam. - a  civilization which is 1400 years old - is one which is rooted in  religion. For a Muslim the greatest aim is to serve God, to  worship God alone, and that is what the word Muslim means. Muslim is not a racial  description, it is not an ethnic category, Muslim means one who  submits. Islam. means submitting to the will of God - the  voluntary submission to God - so Islam. is a religion of  submission. Therefore, in the most important aspect of the  Islamic religion, we find that men and women share in the same  aim and are expected to have the same responsibilities, in that  men and women are both required or obligated to testify that  there is none worthy of worship but Allah alone - God alone - and  that Muhammad is His Messenger. Men and women are both obligated  to pray five times a day, which is the second pillar of Islam.  They are obligated to fast the month of Ramadan. They are  obligated to make pilgrimage to Makkah. They are obligated to  give charity. They are obligated to have the same beliefs. They  are obligated to have the same type of morality and the same type  of code of conduct and behavior. Men and women share these  essential ingredients of Islamic behavior, which define a Muslim  from a non-Muslim. And this is of extreme importance because it  breaks from the tradition of religions. For instance fifty years  before the birth of the prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa  sallam) who was born around 560 CE we find that there was a  gathering of bishops in France to discuss whether women possessed  souls or not, and that, if they do possess souls, what would be  their purpose on earth? Was it to worship God? And if they  worshipped God, would they go to paradise? In the end it was  decided that, yes, women do possess souls - which was a break  from previous tradition - but that their purpose was not just to  worship God, but also to serve men. In Islam., however, the basis of  submission is not that women are submitting to men, but that men  and women together submit to God. So therefore, when you read the  passages of the Qur'an, it becomes very clear that the obedient  from among both the believing men and women receive paradise,  which is the greatest aim and objective in a Muslim's life, and  the basis of that civilization. Likewise, those who are  disobedient and who are renegades, and who do not want to worship  God also receive the same punishment whether they are male or  female. This is why throughout the Qur'an you find the wording  addressed to both males and females. The Arabic language like  French has two types of verbs, one representing the feminine and  one the masculine. So in the Qur'an you'll find both categories  of the human race, both sexes, being addressed. This you find  over and over and over. There is no need to now recite all these  passages, but they are there if anyone wants to know. In summary we found three bases:  that they share the same humanity, that they have the same aim on  this earth, and also, they expect the same reward, which is the  goal which they are working for collectively as human beings. And  this is a break as I said from the previous religious traditions  and also political and social understanding prevalent among the  philosophers before the coming of Islam. And as a result of  that, we find that Islam. accorded women rights which perhaps we  take for granted now, but were given by God to men and women some  1400 years ago. These rights like the right to own property, the  right to dispose of property according to their own wishes as  long as they follow the laws of the religion of Islam., which  apply the same for men or women and the right to certain what we  would call now political rights, like the right to enter into a  treaty with combatant, are something very recent relatively  speaking in the West. One of the rights given by Islam.  in the time of the prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa  sallam) was that if a woman gives a treaty to a combatant from a  non-Muslim attacking force - her treaty would be considered as  was the case with a female companion of the Prophet Muhammad  (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam). In the Christian church these  companions would be called disciples for instance, the disciples  of the Prophet Muhammad are the companions as they are called.  They were in the hundreds and thousands not just twelve as with  Jesus Christ, and there are both men and women amongst them. When  the prophet Muhammad came to Mecca, one of the women companions  by the name of Umm Hani, who was an inhabitant of Mecca and a  believer in the Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam),  accorded certain relatives of hers protection that they would not  be harmed. Her brother who was one of the main companions of the  Prophet Muhammad and married his daughter, Ali Bin Abi Talib,  wanted to execute two of these men who were known for harming the  Muslims and fighting against them. So Umm Hani went to the  Prophet Muhammad and complained that she had accorded them  protection and the Prophet recognized her giving protection to  those two individuals. This is what we might call, in the  classification and terminology that we now use, a political  right. In the sense of according protection for another person  during the state of war is something which is relatively new in  the West and was a known tradition in the Islamic world 1400  years ago. Likewise, in terms of what we might call public  participation, there are certain acts of worship which are public  acts of worship in Islam., and there are certain acts of worship  which are private. One of the public acts is the pilgrimage, when  men and women all make pilgrimage, and this is one of the pillars  of Islam. Likewise another public act of worship is the two `Eid  prayers which occur twice a year, once after the pilgrimage and  once after the pass of Ramadan. Men and women both participate in  that publicly. Likewise, we have a verse which shows that the  social contract between men and women is the same in Islam. This  verse might be translated as the following: "And the  believing men and women are," what we might translate as,  "awliyaa" - the word in Arabic for friends or allies or  supporters of one another, "they" - meaning men and  women - "bid to that which is correct" i.e. they  commend that which is correct, "and they forbid that which  is evil". And this is a corrective process in society,  removing evil and commending that which is good. And then  "they perform the prayer", both men and women,  "they pay the alms", or the charity to the poor,  "and they obey God and His Messenger." And then God  shows them the reward and that they are those upon whom God will  have mercy and God is Almighty and All-Wise. So in this verse, we find that the  social contract between men and women, as individuals in the  society, is the same, that they both go for the highest goal of  bidding or commanding that which is correct, forbidding that  which is evil, and that they share in the two major acts of  worship, which are the prayer and giving charity. They share in  the beliefs and obedience to God and obedience to the Prophet  Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) and likewise, they share  in the reward in the end of obtaining Allah's mercy. This is a  very important concept, which is in contradiction with what the  western tradition is upon today, and that is as I said as a  result of the initial extreme of the Greek philosophers that  women did not share in humanity. As the result of that extreme  another extreme occurred - at least the Muslims consider it  extreme - that there is no difference between men and women. So therefore, the idea of having  genders - this is a term which is not used in a biological sense,  as we might use the word sex in a biological sense for male and  female, but the understanding today is that the traits that  define maleness or femaleness, the social traits and so forth are  determined by upbringing, culture, and environment and that there  is no inherent difference in the way men and women think or act  or what their make up is and so forth. And that is why they use  the term gender. This extreme resulted from the  initial extreme that occurred 2000 years ago, when the Greek  thought that the women did not posses humanity. So as a result of  this 2000 year processes we now come to another extreme - at  least this is what Muslims would say - this extreme now is that  men and women are the same, that there is no difference. Islam., although confirming that  men and women do share in the same essence of humanity, also  confirms that men and women are different. But does this  difference mean that men are inherently good or women are  inherently evil? No. And this is why when you look at one of the  verses in the Qur'an that sheds light on this aspect, God says,  recounting His creation, that He is the One Who created the  night, as it envelops, as it comes - if you look at the horizon,  it comes like a sheet enveloping the horizon - and He is the One  Who created the day as it comes bursting, shining, - that is how  Sun rises and He is the One Who created male and female. And then  the next verse says, verily, what you strive for - human beings  are into different ends, diverse ends - some strive for God's  pleasure, some strive for disobedience of God, some strive to do  good to humans, some strive to do harm, different ends. But what  is the example here? God mentions night and day and then mentions  male and female. The understanding is, yes, night has a purpose,  and in the Qur'an you always find verse after verse, describing  that night has a wisdom behind it. And also it tells humanity  that had it been only night and no day human beings could not  live on earth. And this is now shown scientifically that if it  was only night and there was no sunlight, certain hormones of  body would not be able to reproduce and human beings would die.  Life as we know it on earth would not exist. And likewise, day  has its wisdoms behind it. But can one argue and say, that night  is good and day is evil? No, and no Muslim would believe that.  And can one argue and say that day is good and night is evil? No.  Likewise, male and female also have their roles to play. But can  one say that the role of men is inherently good and the role of  women is inherently evil? No. And can one say the opposite to  that - the role of women is inherently good and the role of men  is inherently evil? No. But they both have a role. This is the main contention now  between western thought and Islamic belief. Western thought has  basically accepted, except for maybe some few corners perhaps in  the Vatican or so, that men and women share in their humanity and  that they are the same. Muslims have believed this for 1400  years. But the difference is that in western thought, as a  reaction to the initial thought that women did not share humanity  fully, the argument is that the roles of men and women in society  are only defined by culture, environment and upbringing,  therefore there is really no true role for men and no true role  for women and that we can switch this, if we just teach the  society correctly. But in Islam. there is a defined role for men  and a defined role for women. Who is the one who defines this  role for men and women? It's their creator. This is the major, if  you want to use the term philosophical, even though it is an  inaccurate term in that sense, but we can just use if for the  lack of better term, philosophical,  ideological or theological difference between the two opposing  arguments. Now with that said, it is important to understand that  when Islam. gave these roles to men and women alike, it put  responsibilities equal to obligations to both. I will give you an  example for that: Islam. senses that women have the nature of  mother not by cultural tradition or by sociological system but  inherently are better in providing and taking care of the  offspring, that there is a bond there which goes beyond  tradition. A psychological bonding, a physical bonding, something  which is more than just traditions of human beings. As a result  of that it has placed greater responsibilities upon women towards  their children are then those of men. At the same time, the obligations  that children have towards their mother in Islam. is greater than  they have towards their fathers, and this is why when the prophet  Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) was asked by a man one  was his companions "Who should I befriend in this  world?" The prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam)  replied "your mother." And then the man asked a second  time, and the prophet replied your mother, and then a third time,  and again he replied your mother, and on the fourth time, he said  "your father". Likewise in the Qur'an we find that it  tells human beings that your mother bore you from one hardship to  the other hardship, talking about the labors and difficulties of  pregnancy and childhood, and then fed you for two years, suckled  you, and tells us to be kind to our parents and reminds us of our  mother first before our fathers.  The point is that even though it  has defined a role for women with the children which is different  than the role of the father, at the same time it gives women  honor and respect from their children which is greater than that  received by the fathers. The fathers do receive respect and their  honor, they are not just thrown out of the picture, but it is  given to them and according to the degree of their  responsibility. And likewise, because the mother inherently, not  just because of cultural tradition, has something inherent which  makes that bond greater between her and her child then the male.  She receives a greater honor and respect from the child and at  the same time she is required to give a greater obligation. I only gave that as an example to  show you that while Islam. recognizes differences between the  sexes, it does not accept the concept that gender is just an  issue of upbringing or cultural traditions, for there are  inherent differences in males and females, and as a result of  that the obligations and responsibilities of each of the two  sexes are together. Imported from that is another matter that  even though men and women are different, they are not in  opposition to one another, which is the basis of much of the  western thought and especially of feminist traditions. That  there's a struggle between men and women, "There is a battle  of sexes", as it is sometimes said in the popular sort of  designation. This doesn't exist in Islam. Men and women work in  tandem, just like day and night revolve, and you live in day time  and you live in night time. You cannot live only in night, and  you cannot live only in day, likewise, men and women are not  against one another, they are not pitted against one another but  rather they share in the same aim, the same purpose of being, the  same humanity. They have different roles, but these roles  complement one another and are needed by one another in order for  the success of humanity, not in this world, but also - of course  since Muslims believe in the hereafter- in the hereafter, which  is the ultimate goal for Muslims. Now, I would like to make one  final comment and then I'll leave it open for questions. Let's  look at the applicabilities of both of these programs. We  discussed a lot of ideas, thoughts and beliefs and historical  concepts, but when they are actually applied, which of the two  view points is more successful. Which brings more bliss to  humanity? Is it the secular western view or is it the Islamic  view? And I have a concrete example which I'd like to share with  you. When I was in Beijing this last summer for the UN 4th world  conference on the women, there was a platform for action which  was being discussed by the different nations and organizations  there. The aim of the platform for action was to upraise, uplift,  and to embetter the status of women around the world, which are  of course noble and correct aims, there is no contention  concerning that. The platform for action was divided into  different areas of concentrations, such as poverty, health,  finances, conflicts and violence and so forth, and one of it was  the girl child. The 12th issue of the 12 concerned areas for the  platform for action, the girl child, the status of girls - future  women - in the world today. The country which was hosting the  conference, China is known for the practice of killing girls. The  reason why is because of their population. You can only have one  child per couple and Chinese by their tradition view males as  fewer then females and so as a result they will usually kill the  female child, in hope that the wife gives birth to a boy.  This is an issue which exists and  because the hosts were the Chinese, the United Nations didn't  really want to get into this issue. They didn't want to talk  about it because it was not politically correct to address that  issue in China. Moreover, even though they might have passed  certain regulations, platforms for actions and certain  commitments which they have required of citizens of the world to  follow, they at the end will see that perhaps in twenty-five to  fifty years the status of the world child will not have markedly  improved. We can see from other things, one  of the major issues which the United Nations was created for  after World War II, was the slaughter of so many million human  beings, six million Jews in Europe, and yet fifty years later, in  the year of the fiftieth celebration of the UN, a genocide has  taken place in Europe of the Bosnians. All the human rights, all  of the declarations in the last fifty years has not been able to  change anything on the ground. Now when the prophet Muhammad  (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) was sent to the Arabs, the Arabs  had the same practice. They used to kill their girl children. The  Arabs killed their girls for a number of reasons, most of the  time due to poverty. Being a desert people without industry or  any sort of means of trade, existence was very minimal. And as a  result, out of fear of poverty they would kill their girl  children, and they would bury them alive. This is a fact which is  mentioned in the Qur'an and was well known during the time of the  prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam). God condemns in  the Qur'an with verses, the idea of killing of the girl child,  the burying in the ground, and also the attitudes of the Arabs  towards girls. One verse in the Qur'an says that "when he is  given the good news that his wife is given birth." God calls  it a good news, " - to a female child, a girl - his face  becomes blackened and he becomes ashamed. Will he hide the fact  "that he has given birth to a girl and not tell the people,  because he feels it as a shame. "Or will he bury it in the  ground", this is a condemnation of the practice of the  people. And likewise the companions of the prophet Muhammad  (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) before they accepted Islam., many  of them killed their girl children. One man came to prophet  Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) and said I killed ten of  my daughters in my lifetime, will I receive paradise? For will  God accept my repentance for this sin, now that I have left this  pagan religion of before, worshipping idols and killing girl  children and so forth. Within one generation, within 23 years  this was how long the prophet was amongst the Arabs, the practice  of killing girls ended. It no longer existed in Arabia. And  likewise, it didn't just stop like that, but a change in attitude  came towards women, in educating them and making morally upright  people. People receive no other reward,  but paradise. Again that is the greatest aim for the Muslim and  that is their motivation and reason of being. So Islam not only  tried removing the negative aspect of murdering girls, but also  included the positive aspect of educating girls and raising them  in society, and this brings me to my final point. This is  something of course which we can look at the previous  declarations of human rights or whatever, irrespective of whether  these being true or false, but they have not been able to achieve  the aims which they have stated. As the example of human rights  and the UN in Bosnia shows. Fifty years after the creation of  the UN, there is no change in Europe, the same land which killed  six million Jews. The same genocide of the Bosnians occurs fifty  years later by the same people who started the UN. They are  unable to stop their own from this matter, and with this I come  to my final point, that I would like to leave you with. Islamic  civilization unlike any other civilization is based, of course on  revelation, but it is in its essence supported and founded by  women. The first person to believe in Prophet Muhammad  (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) was his wife Khadeejah, and it  was through her money and through her support of him, her  financial backing, and also her encouragement that the prophet  was able to spread the message of Islam. in his first year of  prophecy. The pagans did not have the ideas of freedom of  religion, that you can take your own beliefs. This was not  practiced by the pagans of Arabia - they saw this as an  insurrection, they saw this as a changing of their ways, so they  sought to stop it out by torture, by killing and by all other  means that they could. And likewise, they tried to stop the  Islamic revelation, this tradition, when the prophet Muhammad  (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) converted only the people of  Arabia. But as you know there are about one billion Muslims in  the world. They are in every single continent of the world, even  in Beijing where the UN was convening. There was a mosque there  which is over a thousand years old. And the neighborhood that  lives there is about forty to fifty thousands Muslims. Now the  king’s palace, the forbidden city in front of Tien Anh Man  square which many of you have heard of, is only 500 years old.  This shows how the growth of Islam. and the sprit of Islam. is  not just a Middle Eastern phenomenon or an Arabian phenomenon but  extends to all people and races throughout the world. Where is this teaching from, of  course when prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) died  after twenty three years Islam. only spread in Arabia. This  religion of Islam was basically spread by four or five  individuals who had the most in teaching. One of them was the  prophet's wife `Aa’isha. She is among the most to have  narrated his statements and likewise she is amongst the three,  four, five who have mostly given religious pronouncements, who  have given religious verdicts, explained what these verses in the  Qur'an meant or what the words of the prophet meant.  Look at any other civilization in  the history of humanity, you will not find a women playing a role  in its establishment where it can be attributed to her efforts  for its establishment. The Greeks - look at the philosophers  Plato, Aristotle and others - all were men. The early church  fathers writings were basically men and until today the idea of  women scholarship is limited in some areas of the church. The  French writers at the French revolution and Voltaire and the  Russians were men. The founding fathers of the United States were  men, and also other civilizations are basically based upon men.  Islam is the only civilization which is known by humanity where a  leading input in terms of its transmission and establishment was  based upon the efforts of women. Central - and this is an  historical matter which is not open to interpretation, it is a  fact - these are the people who transmitted these teachings these  are the people who supported it hereafter. Those are just some  thoughts and impressions concerning how Islam. uplifted women. |